This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
RE: Debug of Test 15
- To: "Harold Hunt" <huntharo at msu dot edu>
- Subject: RE: Debug of Test 15
- From: "Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre dot Humblet at ieee dot org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 17:50:08 -0400
- Cc: <cygwin-xfree at sources dot redhat dot com>
- References: <3.0.5.32.20010407161253.007ccaa0@pop.ne.mediaone.net>
Harold,
My cygwin dll is from the current setup.
>From cygcheck -s
615k 2001/01/31 C:\progra~1\Cygnus\bin\cygwin1.dll
Cygwin DLL version info:
dll major: 1001
dll minor: 8
dll epoch: 19
dll bad signal mask: 19005
dll old termios: 5
dll malloc env: 28
api major: 0
api minor: 34
shared data: 3
dll identifier: cygwin1
mount registry: 2
cygnus registry name: Cygnus Solutions
cygwin registry name: Cygwin
program options name: Program Options
cygwin mount registry name: mounts v2
cygdrive flags: cygdrive flags
cygdrive prefix: cygdrive prefix
cygdrive default prefix:
build date: Wed Jan 31 10:08:38 EST 2001
shared id: cygwin1S3
At 04:28 PM 4/7/2001 -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
>Pierre,
>
>Well, I can buy that XWin is taking 70% of CPU resources before the freeze,
>as you are outputting to a file everytime select is called, and select gets
>called a lot.
>
>However, select is a "blocking function"; that is, when select is called it
>blocks, taking no clock cycles, until one of the events being waited for has
>occurred. So, select, if it was working correctly, would take no clock
>cycles when it doesn't return.
>
>This leads me to believe that select may not be working correctly.
>
>Chris, any ideas? I believe Pierre is using that latest cygwin1.dll
>snapshot. Could you confirm that to the list Pierre?
>
>Harold
>
>