This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
RE: Possible race condition notes
- To: "'Harold Hunt'" <huntharo at msu dot edu>, "'Cygx (E-mail)'" <cygwin-xfree at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: RE: Possible race condition notes
- From: Suhaib Siddiqi <ssiddiqi at inspirepharm dot com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 06:53:09 -0400
OK. Maybe next time I will read your all posts then answer :)
Suhaib
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harold Hunt [mailto:huntharo@msu.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 10:09 PM
> To: 'Cygx (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: Possible race condition notes
>
>
> Nevermind... FD_SETSIZE is legit. In fact, it isn't needed
> because it is
> defined later as 256 in Xpoll.h.
>
> Harold
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cygwin-xfree-owner@sources.redhat.com
> > [mailto:cygwin-xfree-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of
> Harold Hunt
> > Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 10:03 PM
> > To: Cygx (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: Possible race condition notes
> >
> >
> > cygwin.cf defines FD_SETSIZE=256.
> >
> > However, os/WaitFor.c, os/io.c, and os/connection.c make
> reference to
> > XFD_SETSIZE, not FD_SETSIZE. Is FD_SETSIZE a mistake or legit?
> >
> > Harold
> >
>