Re: [PATCH] Re: pthread

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

I don't see anything in here that points to Cygwin.

>> #0  0xd19025ff in ?? ()
>> #1  0x67004cbf in _size_of_stack_reserve__ ()
>> #2  0x67004fa6 in _size_of_stack_reserve__ ()
>> #3  0x0040a319 in main (argc=1, argv=0xa010f48) at twm.c:291

None of those addresses are cygwin related.

cgf

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 07:32:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Can you list the 5 lines before and after twm.c:291.
>Also can you do update to CVS cygwin and the latest gdb that chris has
>built - he's fixed some headaches with gdb so that we can get better
>info in backtraces.
>
>I'm interest in what frames 2,1, and 0 are(cygwin+gdb update), and if
>there are multiple threads at this point in time (info threads).
>
>Rob
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Alan Hourihane" <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>
>To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
>Cc: <cygwin-xfree@sources.redhat.com>
>Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 3:51 AM
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: pthread
>
>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:47:53PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> > Do you know what function call from twm causes the crash?
>> >
>> I've looked into this and it looks like a stack problem in cygwin.
>>
>> This is the backtrace from gdb. But ignore the line number from twm.c.
>It's
>> complaining about a QueryExtension for the SHAPE routines, but if you
>skip
>> this it fails at the next Query.
>>
>> #0  0xd19025ff in ?? ()
>> #1  0x67004cbf in _size_of_stack_reserve__ ()
>> #2  0x67004fa6 in _size_of_stack_reserve__ ()
>> #3  0x0040a319 in main (argc=1, argv=0xa010f48) at twm.c:291
>> #4  0x61003c02 in _size_of_stack_reserve__ ()
>> #5  0x61003ddd in _size_of_stack_reserve__ ()
>> #6  0x61003e1c in _size_of_stack_reserve__ ()
>> #7  0x004531a3 in cygwin_crt0 ()
>>
>> Hope this helps Rob.
>>
>> Alan.
>>

-- 
cgf@cygnus.com                        Red Hat, Inc.
http://sources.redhat.com/            http://www.redhat.com/