This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
RE: sgml based FAQ authoring
- To: "'Robert Collins'" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>, "'cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com'" <cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: RE: sgml based FAQ authoring
- From: Suhaib Siddiqi <ssiddiqi at inspirepharm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 19:46:17 -0400
Rob
Fine with me :-)
Suhaib
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert.collins@itdomain.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 6:35 PM
> To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject: sgml based FAQ authoring
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
> >
> > So, do you guys need cvs access?
> >
> > cgf
>
> Well we haven't asked for any sort of community consensus on moving to
> sgml based authoring for the FAQ. But I'm pretty convinced we'll end up
> with an easy to use system, given what our research to date has
> generated.
>
> So, if anyone has objections to our moving the FAQ to a SGML based
> authoring system please say so now!. I think moving to SGML/XML is a
> good thing.
> note:
> this isn't a request for "point 3.4 in the draft is wrong!"
> This is a request for "end users cannot use sgml" or "WIKI's are better"
> or other such __non-content__ answers.
>
> Once the authoring system is prepped and decided on, content will be
> on-topic.
>
>
> Chris: lets wait a day or so for any feedback, and then in the absence
> of issues - yes please.
>
> The package will likely contain all the SGML source we develop - so
> thing like the cygxfree-docs name I've got makes sense to me :].
>
> Rob