This is the mail archive of the cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: missing telnet, solution


Phil,

I'll change the wording in that section of the User's Guide to reflect that
not all Cygwin packages are selected by default.  Thanks for pointing that
out to me.

Sorry, it gets a little rough around here sometimes because we don't have
many contributors.  :(

Note, the update won't go in immediately, but it shouldn't take more than a
few weeks.

Harold

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com
> [mailto:cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com]On Behalf Of Phil Burk
> Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 2:23 AM
> To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: missing telnet, solution
>
>
> From: "Christopher Faylor" <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
> > wasn't.  It never occurred to us that people wouldn't be able to figure
> > out that you could click on things and see packages to install.  But,
> > that was the case.
>
> Give me a break. I'm not stupid.  The documentation for Cygwin/XFree said
> "All packages, downloaded size of 56.1 MiB as of 2001-04-19, are selected
> for download by default; I do not recommend changing the list of
> packages to
> download unless you really know what you are doing:". This is on page:
>
>    http://cygwin.com/xfree/docs/ug/setup-cygwin-downloading.html
>
> I just followed the docs and it didn't work because telnet was
> missing. All
> I am suggesting is that the documents be updated so that if people follow
> them then they will be successful. I also suggested adding a line to the
> Cygwin package list that says "You can use SETUP.EXE from the installer to
> add packages from this list.". It was not obvious to me that the same
> installer is used for installation and also for adding packages after
> installation.
>
> I also publish free software so I appreciate the eforts that have
> gone into
> Cygwin and XFree86. But when people tell me that they have
> problems with my
> docs, then I try to correct them (the docs, not the people). I don't
> understand why there has been so much resistance from this group
> to making a
> couple lines of change to the docs.  They are simply out of date and could
> easily be corrected.
>
> Sometimes things seem obvious to the developer but only because the
> developer already knows them. It is possible that reasonably intelligent
> people cannot read the developers mind and may need to read the docs
> instead.
>
> Phil Burk
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]