RE: FW: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem

["Harold Hunt" <huntharo at msu dot edu>]

Alan,

Yup.  I just built it with no problems.

Harold

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com
> [mailto:cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com]On Behalf Of Alan Hourihane
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:31 PM
> To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: FW: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem
>
>
> I can remove it - no problem.
>
> Have you tried building the tree without it first though ?
>
> Alan.
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:17:29 -0500, Harold Hunt wrote:
> > Here is what Paul had to say.  Put together with what Alan said
> it sounds
> > like __STDC__ will be coming out of StandardDefines.
> >
> > Alan, do you want to commit this directly, or would you like me
> to submit a
> > patch?
> >
> > Harold
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Stodghill [mailto:stodghil@cs.cornell.edu]
> > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:53 PM
> > To: Harold Hunt
> > Subject: RE: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem
> >
> >
> > It's been over a year, but I believe that my reasoning was as follows,
> >
> > I guess it is not technically a bug. However, the C standard
> (or at least
> > the c9x draft that I have) says that __STDC__ is a predefined
> implementation
> > specific macro. The GCC manual discusses how __STDC__ is set
> depending upon
> > the use of the -traditional flag. I don't believe that it makes
> sense to set
> > or unset __STDC__ either from the command line or using preprocessor
> > directives.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Harold Hunt [mailto:huntharo@msu.edu]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:32 PM
> > > To: Paul Stodghill
> > > Cc: cygx
> > > Subject: RE: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem
> > >
> > >
> > > I recently stumbled across a message you wrote way back in March 2001:
> > > http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-patches/200103/msg00082.html
> > >
> > > I notice that you say that cygwin.cf shouldn't be defining __STDC__ in
> > > StandardDefines.  I can see that linux.cf and darwin.cf do not define
> > > __STDC__ in StandardDefines, but I don't know why we should
> > > not be defining
> > > it either.
> > >
> > > A quick and explanation would get this problem quickly
> > > remedied (I like to
> > > do things correctly, so I'd like to fix this problem).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Harold
> > >
> > >