This is the mail archive of the cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Window Manager Performance...


Well, I also used the lesstif mwm for a while and noticed (using the MS Task
Manager) that mwm was consuming an *extraordinary* amount of the CPU.  

When I first used lesstif, I compiled it all myself, and had no such
problems. That, however, was several versions of lesstif ago, and being the
lazy soul that I am, I now use the precompiled binaries.

I don't know if this is related to the manner in which the latest binaries
have been created, or if it is related to code changes in the version
upgrades.  I never pursued this, having moved on since to IceWM.

Good hunting....
	-D.
---------------------
David Dawson
david.w.dawson@lmco.com
703-367-3885


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Thomas Chadwick [SMTP:j_tetazoo@hotmail.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:12 PM
> To:	cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject:	Window Manager Performance...
> 
> I've been using Cygwin/Xfree some some time now, and until recently,
> always 
> ran the window manager as a local client (as is the case with the stock 
> startxwin scripts).  I started out using twm, then moved on the fvwm2, and
> 
> then most recently Lesstif's mwm.
> 
> However, a few days ago I ran the window manager off a remote machine with
> a 
> command sequence something like this:
> 
> bash> XWin.exe &
> (wait for server to finish starting up)
> bash> xhost $remote_host
> bash> rsh $remote_host xterm -display $local_host:0 &
> bash> rsh $remote_host mwm   -display $local_host:0
> 
> [Note: $local_host is an IBM ThinkPad iSeries w/ 700MHz PIII + 256MB SDRAM
> 
> running Win2k SP2; $remote_host is an IBM RS/6000 Model 170 running
> AIX4.3; 
> network is 100BaseT Ethernet]
> 
> After doing this, I noticed a dramatic improvement in the "response" of X
> my 
> session (e.g. typing seems to have less lag, movement of windows, scroll 
> bars, etc. appears to be more "fluid").
> 
> I find it surprising that the additional communications overhead of
> running 
> the window manager remotely is more than made up for by the fact that it's
> 
> running in a "native" unix environment (vs. cygwin).
> 
> I'm curious if other people have had a similar experience.
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]