RE: Setup bug --- probably already reported and fixed, of course[Scanned]

["Robert McNulty Junior" <bmj2001 at bellsouth dot net>]

Same here, Harold.
I've not written a message in a long time to this list.


-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com
[mailto:cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com]On Behalf Of Harold L Hunt II
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 10:01 PM
To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Setup bug --- probably already reported and fixed, of
course[Scanned]


What the hell is going on here?  I have gotten copies of this message in
my inbox and failure messages saying that my responses to it (which I
wrote over a month ago) were rejected because they are text/html.

I am a little confused as to whether or not this is a problem with my
mail host or with sources.redhet.com... anyone care to guess?  It seems
that these messages are replaying from somewhere.

Harold

Robert Collins wrote:

> On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 01:30, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>
>>FYI --- In further testing, archive.progeny.com is the mirror that has
>>not been updated yet.  Selecting only archive.progeny.com gives me the
>>warning about setup.ini being older than when I last installed Cygwin.
>>Selecting only mirrors.rcn.net does not give such a warning and
>>correctly indicates that the XFree86-bin tarball is roughly 10500 KiB
>>and downloads it and all other tarballs with no problems.  Thus, this
>>does not so far appear to be entirely my fault.
>
>
> When you updated the X tarballs, did you bump the version number for the
> tarballs? (i.e. did they have -unique- file names compared to the
> existing tarballs?)
>
> Cheers,
> Rob