This is the mail archive of the cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: can't use windows with GoBack?


Harold:

Until this GoBack problem occurred, I was using
XWin -unixkill -emulate3buttons -clipboard -rootless &
wmaker &

I also used a few xterm commands, with very good performance:
xterm -sb -bg white -fg darkblue -cr red -ms red -bd red -geometry 80x84+91+0 -name left &
xterm -sb -bg white -fg darkblue -cr red -ms red -bd red -geometry 80x84+592+0 -name center &
xterm -sb -bg white -fg darkblue -cr red -ms red -bd red -geometry 80x84-0+0 -name right &
xterm -sb -bg white -fg darkblue -cr red -ms red -bd red -geometry 250x84-0+0 -name large &

After I installed GoBack, I hit the terrible/impossible performance.
I found that
XWin -unixkill -emulate3buttons -clipboard -multiwindow &
and with even 1 or 2 xterm windows was just a bit better, but still miserable.

I tried your suggestions:
XWin -engine 1 -unixkill -emulate3buttons -clipboard -multiwindow &
XWin -fullscreen -emulate3buttons -clipboard &
with just one xterm window, but these seem just as slow.  (The fullscreen
would not be so good for me as I often need multiple windows.)

I disabled GoBack, rebooted as required, and I'm now running
XWin -unixkill -emulate3buttons -clipboard -multiwindow &
just fine.

I noted that with or without GoBack my browsers and other PC applications
seemed to work fine.  Of course, when I brought up any XWin tool, all
performance was degraded due to the load on the System.

I appreciate your trying to help.
Thanks.

Lester


: Lester,
: 
: Lester Ingber wrote:
: 
: 
:   Harold:
: 
: 
: ... interesting that you should ask about the hardware.  The GoBack tech
: said that most of the problems they are having is with some kinds of hardware.
:   Yes, my Thinkpad A31 p has an ATI Mobility Fire GL 7800 graphics card. 
: 
: Well then, the first thing for you to check is if "XWin -engine 1" has 
: acceptable performance. If not, try "XWin -fullscreen". The first of these tests 
: will use the GDI-based bit block transfer function, while the latter will use 
: the DirectDraw bit block transfer function. Please report on the performance of 
: both tests.
: 
: The ATI 8500 series had some versions of the driver that had terrible DirectDraw 
: performance. This was fixed by a driver update, but it was very difficult to get 
: the driver update to actually install properly. If you have DirectDraw driver 
: problems then you will likely notice problems in other DirectDraw-based apps, 
: such as those that play video like Window Media Player or Real Player. Your 
: GDI-based performance (-engine 1) should be unaffected by a problem with the 
: DirectDraw driver.
: 
: For more information on how ATI botched their drivers, and for a little info on 
: how changes to certain system DLLs can affect performance, see the following:
: 
: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-12/msg00049.html
: 
: Harold

-- 
 Prof. Lester Ingber  ingber@ingber.com  ingber@alumni.caltech.edu
 www.ingber.com                     www.alumni.caltech.edu/~ingber


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]