This is the mail archive of the cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: X/Cygwin icon proposal


Nahor wrote:

> ok, from your images, your system at least uses the non-alpha icons.
> What color resolution is your monitor at?

16bit

> > cygwin is unix. unix is simple (shell and stuff) and this is the opposite
> > of the bubble-gum os WinXP with alpha channel.
>
> Uh? I don't get your point. I personally don't buy a machine just to run
> unix. I use it to do other stuff (mostly compilation) that do make use
> of CPU power.

The host I use at work is win2k. We have bought our _first_ XP host last
week. I don't know any company which choose XP over 2000. XP requries a
lot more resources than 2000 and a computer magizine even stated that XP
wastes about 200MHz. (2Ghz with XP is as fast as 1.8Ghz with win2k)
The other host is linux since compiling with cygwin is so slow (the 500Mhz
host compiles the xorg tree much faster than the 1.8Ghz windows/cygwin host)

> So I have a recent machine, so I have XP. I assume that
> quit a dew (most?) geeks using Cygwin/XFree would be in the same case.
> But it's just a guess.

This is a wild guess. gamers usally spend more on recent hardware than
geeks. geeks by unusual, cool hardware. but speed is not as important as
for gamers.

bye
    ago

NP: Dekoy - Darkest Eve
-- 
 Alexander.Gottwald@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
 http://www.gotti.org           ICQ: 126018723


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]