This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: Start script changes
- From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:03:11 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Start script changes
- References: <B74CF8E243E50A43B2562370EBD9DBEC17FB86@heis-2000server.heis.co.uk>
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
Actually, I would suggest moving *all* of the X stuff into /usr/bin (or,
rather, /bin), and mounting /bin on /usr/X11R6/bin to keep the broken apps
and old scripts happy.
Igor
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Phil Betts wrote:
> Harold,
>
> Since /usr/X11R6 is apparently "an abomination", you'll have no qualms
> about moving run.exe into /usr/bin (alias /bin), right? ;-)
>
> You can say yes now and skip to the last two paragraphs, it's mostly
> justification for the change. However, if you need more convincing...
>
> I've got a startxwin.bat that makes the same assumption about the
> location
> of /bin as cygwin.bat i.e. it (more or less) tries to do the following:
>
> C:
> chdir \cygwin\bin
> set CYGWIN="tty"
> bash -lc /usr/X11R6/bin/startxwin.sh
>
> This works. If I run this from a shortcut, I can make it start
> minimised so that the DOS box is hidden, but I'd prefer to get rid of it
> entirely once X has started.
>
> The problem is that, even though startxwin.sh runs xterm as a background
> process and then bash exits, the DOS box doesn't close until the last
> client (i.e. xterm) has died.
>
> One solution is: insist that ALL background processes be started using
> run.exe rather than just putting them in the background. I've rejected
> this because it is unreasonable to force shell script writers to be
> aware of the foibles of DOS - we want to leave behind all DOS baggage in
> the .bat file :-)
>
> Another solution: use run.exe to start bash. I don't think we can
> assume ANY of the cygwin directories are in %PATH%, so the bash line
> becomes:
>
> C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\run.exe bash -lc /usr/X11R6/bin/startxwin.sh
>
> This is useless for me, because /usr is on my D: drive and as one of the
> prime motivations for making the change is to make the scripts more
> universal, this too has to be rejected.
>
> If instead, we chdir to the (DOS) location of /usr/X11R6/bin, e.g. in my
> case D:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin, we can't guarantee that bash will start OK
> (it won't find cygwin1.dll for starters).
>
> Therefore, the cleanest solution would be to move run.exe to /usr/bin.
> Then, the startxwin.bat can just:
> run bash -lc /usr/X11R6/bin/startxwin.sh
>
> Any shortcut to run the .bat file just needs the target to be the batch
> file itself, there's no need to be careful about setting its starting
> directory. It could hardly be simpler.
>
> In case you're wondering, startxdmcp.bat is virtually the same except it
> sets REMOTE_HOST then runs bash as:
> run bash -lc /usr/X11R6/bin/startxwin.sh -xdmcp %REMOTE_HOST%
>
> The XDMCP specific bits in startxdmcp.bat have migrated into
> startxwin.sh.
>
> If you're OK with run.exe moving into /usr/bin, I should be able to get
> a patch out tomorrow.
>
> It might be worth pointing out that with run.exe in /bin, the batch
> files are pretty redundant. I've got a shortcut with a target of:
> C:\cygwin\bin\run.exe bash -lc /usr/X11R6/bin/startxwin.sh
> which runs fine so long as "Start in:" is "C:\cygwin\bin".
>
> Perhaps you could clarify: if run.exe moves to /usr/bin, should this be
> referred to (in the xxx.in files) as "/usr/bin", "/bin" or
> "@some_autoconf_macro@"? @prefix@ appears to be /usr/X11R6, and the
> other autoconf directories seem to be derived from this e.g.
> @exec_prefix@ and @bindir@, so none of them seem to be applicable.
>
> Longer term, wouldn't it make more sense to persuade Charles Wilson (the
> cygutils maintainer) to adopt run.exe as an addition to the cygutils
> family? There is nothing X about it after all, and it would also make
> it available to other folk that aren't interested in X (there must be
> some out there ;-). It may need a name change to cygrun, but that's not
> going to hurt.
>
> Phil
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton