This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Should 6.8.99.901-1 be marked experimental?
- From: "James R. Phillips" <antiskid56-cygwin at yahoo dot com>
- To: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Should 6.8.99.901-1 be marked experimental?
- Reply-to: antiskid56-cygwin at yahoo dot com
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
Hi,
AFAICT there is no release announcement for 6.8.99.901-1, and there are several
bug reports requiring manual intervention or downgrades. In fact I am
experiencing lockups myself, and had to downgrade.
This being the case (no release announcement + egregious regressions),
shouldn't 6.8.99.901-1 be marked as experimental, so people don't upgrade to it
semi-automatically?
James R. Phillips
cygwin octave/ghostscript maintainer
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/