This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: Should 6.8.99.901-1 be marked experimental?
- From: Alan Hourihane <alanh at fairlite dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:53:55 +0100
- Subject: Re: Should 6.8.99.901-1 be marked experimental?
- References: <20060817203150.73110.qmail@web51506.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:31 -0700, James R. Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAICT there is no release announcement for 6.8.99.901-1, and there are several
> bug reports requiring manual intervention or downgrades. In fact I am
> experiencing lockups myself, and had to downgrade.
>
> This being the case (no release announcement + egregious regressions),
> shouldn't 6.8.99.901-1 be marked as experimental, so people don't upgrade to it
> semi-automatically?
If you haven't already, bugs should be filed at...
http://bugs.freedesktop.org
under the xorg component.
Alan.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/