This is the mail archive of the email@example.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project. See the Cygwin
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: MKS Tool kit copies request
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: MKS Tool kit copies request
- From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 19:57:28 -0500
- Delivered-To: email@example.com
- Delivered-To: mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org
- Mailing-List: contact email@example.com; run by ezmlm
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> From: Jason Zions <email@example.com>
>> As for Dave Korn claiming that only U/WIN has a "real" KornShell, this
>I'm not sure he's ever claimed this. He did point out to MS that
>the version they plan to ship isn't very compatible with most
Yes he had claimed that on a few occasions on U/WIN users mailing list, a
>I've never heard Korn speak on the subject, so I've no idea if this
>reasonably reflects his views. The Korn shell has been standardized,
>in XPG4 at least if not POSIX, and the version marketed by MKS has
>long had the reputation of being about the least compatible Korn
>shell available on any platform. I've never used it, I've no idea
>how accurate that characterization was back then, and I don't know if
>they've brought it more closely into line since it was standardized.
Ksh in MKS Tool kit's ksh is not bad for normal scripting tasks. Most of
the ksh features are implemented, at least all the standards.
>Why pay money for a commercial product with a poor reputation when
>pdksh is available?
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to email@example.com