This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
- To: Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU>
- Subject: RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
- From: William Gacquer <wgacquer@ubisoft.fr>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 10:58:45 +0200
- Cc: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com, egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
Hi!
gcc-2.95 does not perform very well compared to egcs1.1.2 on a win32
platform. Please have a look at this small benchmark collection :
<<tench.zip>> Take care : it contains a pure win32 makefile!
Any idea why gcc-2.95 is so slow?
Regards,
William
William Gacquer
Ubi Studios - Ubi Soft Entertainment
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mumit Khan [SMTP:khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU]
> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 1999 7:35 PM
> To: William Gacquer
> Cc: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject: RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
>
> On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, William Gacquer wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> > I did some benchmarks in order to compare egcs 1.1.2 with gcc 2.95.
> > The last one is much slower than egcs 1.1.2 (except in one test). Why
> are
> > the binaries (with full optimisation) so slow with gcc 2.95?
>
> I have no idea. It would be very useful if you can send a few testcases
> to egcs@egcs.cygnus.com.
>
> > On which egcs branch is it based?
>
> GCC and EGCS are now merged, so egcs branch is irrelevant. The gcc-2.95
> branch is based mostly on the egcs mainline (not the egcs-1.1.x branch).
>
> Regards,
> Mumit
>
tench.zip
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com