This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: New Cygwin DLL 1.1.1
- To: "cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com" <cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: New Cygwin DLL 1.1.1
- From: "Michael Ring" <Michael dot Ring at t-mobil dot de>
- Date: 17 May 2000 13:09:53 +0000
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: (43) (12) (2) (135) (115) (5) (6) (3)
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: (1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (6), (1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (1)
- X400-Content-Identifier: D821ILT399G3
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 (22)
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=DTM/ADMD=DBP/C=DE/;32CBE84911D42C0500AAD4AA]
- X400-Originator: Michael.Ring@t-mobil.de
- X400-Received: by mta MB400-SMTP in /PRMD=DTM/ADMD=DBP/C=DE/;Relayed ; 17 May 2000 13:10:27 +0000
- X400-Received: by mta MB400-DXCW04 in /PRMD=DTM/ADMD=DBP/C=DE/;Relayed ; 17 May 2000 13:09:53 +0000
- X400-Recipients: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
On Wed, 17 May 00 14:19:29 +0100, you wrote:
>Hallo Christopher,
>
>I have a lot of problems with cygwin on NT4.0 (SR5) german:
>
>One on our Software Projects (on True64/Digital Alpha)
>uses egcs 1.1.2. Now we are porting our software to Linux and NT.
>The NT port is my part...
>The last cygwin version contains gcc.2.95 .
>Different compilers think different about c++ and
>so i tried to compile egcs-1.1.2 on NT.
>This failed: the compilation failed in stage2 (or so)
>the xgcc in Stage2 (or was it stage 1 ?) failed and
>printed an ugly message
>
>Q: Do you know about this problem ? Can
> you build an egcs-1.1.2-Compiler (give me the binaries ;-) )
>
Did you use 'plain' egcs or a version with the patches from mummit khan. I
compiled egcs-1.1.2 with Mummit's patches on a cygwin-snapshot a few months ago
and everything worked fine.
Michael Ring
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com