This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: CygUtils Version of zip (and Symlinks)
- To: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: CygUtils Version of zip (and Symlinks)
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 13:22:17 -0400
- References: <200005251558.IAA25370@cygnus.com> <20000525120553.E1330@cygnus.com>
- Reply-To: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:05:53PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:56:53AM -0500, Parker, Ron wrote:
>>This may be more a question for cygwin-developers, but I hate crossposts and
>>know most readers of that list at least review this one. So, wouldn't it be
>>appropriate when compiling without -mno-cygwin for the specs file to define
>>"unix", "UNIX" and similar "standard" defines? They seem to be checked for
>>in newlib, zlib, X11, and many other sources?
>
>I don't see why it would be appropriate to define UNIX when you're specifying
>a command line option that says "This is not UNIX". So, no, I don't believe
>that this is appropriate. I don't even know that newlib will build correctly
>with -mno-cygwin.
Sorry. I misread what was written above. It does make sense to define these
and, in fact, I am fairly certain that they used to be defined.
Apologies for the misinterpretation.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com