Re: [avail for test] xpm-4.0.0-1

["Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu>]

Since I had no error reports from testing of this package, and my own
tests showed that it works fine, I am going to remove the 'test'
designator on xpm-4.0.0-1.  Any objections?

--Chuck

P.S. I asked for comments on the point quoted below, but received none. 
I suppose everyone agrees with my reasoning?

> o PLEASE comment: the dll's are versioned as "4", not "3" -- but this is
> NOT because the sources came from XFree86- ***4*** .0.0.  According to
> xpm.h, the library version number, which remains "3.4k" even in the
> XFree86-4.0.0 sources, should be parsed as follows:
>    XpmFormat "3"
>    XpmVersion "4"
>    XpmRevision "11" ( "k" is the 11th letter of the alphabet )
> Quoting: "we forget the 3 which is the format number" so the SO version
> is 4.11 (which I simplified down to just SOMAJOR = 4 ).  Did I do the
> right thing in using "4" as the dll version number?

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com