This is the mail archive of the cygwin@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Reason for cygwin GCC 2.97 non-bootstrap found

On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:01:30PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > IMO there's no pressing reason to do _any_ of it in libiberty,
> 
> The original patches included an implementation of valloc() in
> libiberty, for systems that didn't have one, so that ggc could rely on
> a working valloc.

The point being?  There's _still_ no reason it _must_ be done
in libiberty.


r~

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]