This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: RE: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:27:14 +1000
- Thread-Index: AcDCEtDSo5aKmhuuRZusU+D5YqEs8gAAsylQ
- Thread-Topic: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:02 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW:
> pthread_create problem
> in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:00:10AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> This is one of those situations where it looks like gcc can't be
> >> released until a version of cygwin is released with the requisite
> >> functionality.
> >
> >What's missing? I have a list of over 20 functions in front
> of me that
> >I've just coded stubs for...
>
> What I was referring to is that if we release a version of
> gcc which relies
> on functions available only in cygwin snapshots that's
> clearly a problem.
>
> I don't know specifically what pthread functionality gcc
> uses, however.
>
> cgf
>
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you meant that you had to hold of
releasing gcc 2.95.3 at all until cygwin had enough pthread support to
build gcc with threads enabled.
Rob
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple