This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: make
We disable Mcafee for the builds as it adds to much overhead.
I am looking in Task Manager to start with to see the utilization.
I see no difference from using make -j x (where x is the number of
processors).and make without the -j switch.
By using make -j you can take advantage of parallel executions.
Please let me know if I'm invoking it incorrectly.
At 09:21 PM 11/7/2001 -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David" <dnkohn@iadfw.net>
>To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 6:45 PM
>Subject: make
>
>
> > I am somewhat new to cygwin ( have been using it for a few months) and am
> > currently assisting our developers.
> > I am setting up builds using the 1.3.2 version and I'm trying to find out
> > if make under cygwin can do parallel processing. I saw a note on the
> > 3.77.1 version of make that parallel processing code had been worked on.
> >
> > I've tried make -j 2 for a 2 processor machine but the cpu utilization is
> > still down at 3-6%.
>That is typical, if you have McAfee running in command script checking mode.
> > Has the code for parallel processing been tested for NT ? How does one
> > verify that it is working ?
>By working, you mean tasks starting while other tasks are
>executing?...Shorter over-all elapsed time, with multiple processors? May
>not happen if you're running McAfee. Have you tried Task Manager or
>Perfmon?
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/