This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Invisible link?


On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:09:31PM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
>--- Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:08:33PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> >John Carlyle- Clarke wrote:
>> >> Darn -- figured it out about 10 seconds after I hit send.  It
>> was of course a
>> >mount.  I unmounted, created an empty /usr/lib and
>> >> then remounted, and now it shows in the folder listing.  Sorry
>> about that.
>> >
>> >WARNING! This is inadvisable! Imagine... some Cygwin binary
>> tarballs installing
>> >stuff into /lib, others into /usr/lib, depending on configuration
>> and how the
>> >package works. Ditto /bin and /usr/bin.
>> 
>> Actually, I don't see any harm in it at all as long as the mounts
>> are
>> set up appropriately so that c:\cygwin\lib == /usr/lib .  The
>> existence
>> of a c:\cygwin\usr\lib directory should really not cause any
>> problems.
>
>If it helps, just think of cygwin mounts like bindmounts [mount -o
>bind ...] in linux.  FWICT, the behavior seems to be identical [other
>then how you actually mount them].

Also, if you heat the paper over a light bulb, you may start to see
messages appear.

Oh wait.  That's invisible *ink*.

Nevermind.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]