This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install?
- From: "Rolf Campbell" <rcampbell at tropicnetworks dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:31:05 -0500
- Subject: Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install?
- References: <20030214182615.GA20996@redhat.com>
Well, I maintain an internal mirror for my company, and I use a custom
python script to parse our custom setup.ini and fetch the needed packages.
But, I never used sources.redhat.com.
"Christopher Faylor" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> I tried an experiment recently where I turned on ftp access to the
> cygwin download directory on sources.redhat.com. The result seemed
> to be that people started downloading cygwin's package .tar.bz2 files
> directly and (somehow) used tar to extract files rather than running
> So, that experiment was a bad idea. I turned off access again. Yet, I
> still have the feeling that many people are downloading packages
> directly (from mirrors I suppose) and then we get to experience the
> maddening "I downloaded foo and it gives me an error about missing bar.
> What in the world could possibly be the problem????"
> Can anyone offer any explanation about this? Or maybe convince me that
> I'm wrong in noticing this trend? I suppose that it is possible that
> we are now hitting a newer stupider brand of user who just can't be
> bothered to read the cygwin web site and click on a link to download
> but I'm wondering if there is another explanation. Maybe there is
> a popular web page out there with wrong advice or something...
> Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
> Special for spam email harvesters: send email to email@example.com
> and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html