This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Is gcc 2 still supported in cygwin at all?
- From: Dalibor Topic <robilad at yahoo dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 08:13:19 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: Is gcc 2 still supported in cygwin at all?
--- Christopher Faylor <email@example.com> wrote:
> It's supported, but, like everything, unless you can
> demonstrate with
> a *simple* test case that there is actually a gcc
> problem (which is
> unlikely) rather than a programming error (which is
> more likely), you
> aren't apt to get much help.
thanks, that's a quick reply ;)
I'll see what I can produce, but I don't have high
hopes. Is it a reasonable tactic to nail down the bug
to compare gcc assembler output for a single function
between i386-cygwin and i386-linux? Can I expect them
to be similar for the same version of the compiler
when I compile them with the same flags?
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html