This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: basename() implementation?
- From: "Elfyn McBratney" <elfyn-cygwin at exposure dot org dot uk>
- To: "cygwin" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>,"Joshua Kwan" <joshk at triplehelix dot org>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 05:59:32 +0100
- Subject: Re: basename() implementation?
- References: <20030501042813.GA15911@triplehelix.org>
> I've read the archive and apparently there is a basename function
> floating around *somewhere* in cygwin. But what header should I use and
> what header should I link against to use it?
>
> BTW, I'm using libtool now so *supposedly* building shlibs are fixed.
Josh, thank you for reminding me to get off my...! {base,dir}name() are not
yet implemented, however they should be in the next release
> Also, I would like to know why the libtool.m4 for cygwin fancies looking
> for a fortran compiler in configure! It's totally nonsensical to me, can
> anyone clear this up or tell me how to get rid of it? There is *no*
> fortran code in my project.
>
> Regards,
> Josh
It shouldn't matter, anyhow IIRC there's an autoconf macro to disable
looking for the (a) fortan compiler.
Elfyn
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/