Re: merging mingw and cygwin

["Paul G." <pgarceau at comcast dot net>]

On 11 Oct 2003 at 19:01, Edward Peschko wrote:

> > What would be the point?
> 
> lack of end-user confusion... elimination of duplicate development
> effort... elimination of duplicate maintenance effort... the ability
> to compile all unix tools 'native' win32 for those who desire it.

	Umm...Cygwin is setup to compile all, or as many as it is possible to support,  unix/posix tools in a "native" win32 
environment at a cost (in terms of systems resources).  The cost is lower (in terms of systems resources/overhead) 
for Msys than is the cost (in terms of systems resources/overhead and in terms of Unix-like support and Posix 
support) for Cygwin.  In fact it might help to read the documentation (if it hasn't been read) at the Mingw 
(http://www.mingw.org) site to get a better sense of the differences between the two and why those differences exist.

	Paul G.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/