This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: {FAQ, UG} alert? rebase


At 09:26 AM 2/23/2004, Thomas L Roche you wrote:
>At 09:38 PM 2/22/2004, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>>> Given recent traffic concerning the goodness of rebase'ing, e.g.
>
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01097.html
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00899.html
>
>>> (but occasional breakage, e.g.
>
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01100.html
>
>>> ) perhaps some treatment of the topic is FAQ- or UG-worthy?
>
>Larry Hall 02/22/2004 10:49:11 PM:
>> I think we can categorize the current problem as a bug.
>
>The zsh problem, yes
>
>> Given that this is likely a bug, it doesn't make much sense to
>> document it formally in the FAQ or UG.
>
>I wasn't proposing to document the zsh/rebase bug, but rather the
>
>* general goodness of rebase
>
>* specific use of rebase for problem solution (e.g. prior to
>  full-scale debugging) and general "cygwin hygeine."


Ah, my apologies!  Sure, this makes sense.  Patch away! :-)



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]