This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GPL violation ?



On Wed, 5 May 2004, Chris Herborth wrote:

> Vince Hoffman wrote:
>
> > Checkpoint appear to be distributing cygwin1.dll (as well as gzip and
> > gtar) without any obvious sources available. if fact of the 3 GPL utils
> > its the only that doesnt have its own copying notice (they do at least
> > provide a copy of the GPL.)
>
> Go read the GPL; you only need to provide sources to people who
> _ask_for_them_.  These days, you could probably just refer them to a web
> page or something.  Also, they have to make any _changes_ they've made to
> the source available.
Umm actualy
a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source
code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above
on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to
give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically
performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the
corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1
and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer to
distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is allowed only
for noncommercial distribution and only if you received the program in
object code or executable form with such an offer, in accord with
Subsection b above.)

I saw none of the above, there was no source, there was no offer of
source.
This comes up on here every now and then and if i didnt think it was a
possible issue i wouldnt have brought it up.
Mind you IANAL so i could have bought this up for nothing, thus passing
the buck to to other (hopefully) more knowledgeable people than me (ie the
list)

 >
> Including GPL'd code in a project as a shared library/DLL is just peachy;
> GPL requires the end-user to be able to replace/upgrade the GPL'd hunk
> without intervention.
>
> I went through all this nonsense (IMHO) when I built a binary Python
> distribution for BeOS way back when... I wanted to include readline support,
> but libreadline is GPL'd.
>
> > I havent contacted them about this as i could be in error and havent at
> > the moment got time for an exaustive search of their site, but i thought
> > i'd best let the list know.
>
> So contact their tech support and tell them you want the code for
> cygwin1.dll, gzip, tar, plus any changes they've made to the code...
>
> Hope I wasn't sounding too snippy in this message, I've actually had to
> explain this several times this week.  Must be related to the change in
> seasons. ;-)

No prob, as i said all i wanted to do was alert more knowledgeable people
to a possiblilty.
>
> --
> Chris Herborth                                     chrish@cryptocard.com
> Documentation Overlord, CRYPTOCard Corp.      http://www.cryptocard.com/
> Never send a monster to do the work of an evil scientist.
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]