This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Program exited with code 0303000
- From: "Dan Osborne" <dan dot osborne at ramesys dot com>
- To: "'Cygwin at Cygwin dot Com'" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:33:09 +0100
- Subject: RE: Program exited with code 0303000
> Um. Bizarre. You did build with -g and -O0, didn't you? Is
> this an actual
> function call here, or does add_var turn out to be some kind of
> macro or something
> that otherwise gets inlined?
Well I was actually using -ggdb3 but I tried -g -O0 and it made no
difference. I think the add_var line is spurious as there is no
__cxa_rethrow in otlv4.h
>
> Hmm. Have you properly used 'throws XXX' declarations on all
> the function
> prototypes that need them?
>
Err, no there aren't any - I'll add them and see if it helps.
> > So I'm wondering firstly why gdb seems to have a mismatch
> > between address
> > and source line number and why that throw didn't get caught
> > in my catch in
> > main.
>
> You haven't shown me your main catch clause, but I'll assume
> that it covers all
> exception types (or at any rate, that it includes
> RProgReturnException). As I
> suggest above, giving bad information to the compiler (through
> missing or bogus
> throws decls) can cause it to generate bad unwind info: and we
> can pretty much
> presume that the unwind info has to be bad in some way and that's
> why it's missing
> your outer catch when it unwinds.
Yes, there's a catch (...) so I'll work on those throws clauses.
Oh and the throw is in a shared library with the catch in my main if that
has any bearing.
Thanks,
Dan
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/