This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: recv and errno during a connection reset/closed by peert


On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Brian Ford wrote:

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Peter Stephens wrote:

I have thought about your suggestion and it makes a lot of sense.

It seems like your suggestion would be very portable.  A good suggestion and
the most likely route for me at this point.

Not to me. Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems you are going to a lot of effort to poorly recreate poll/select?

Why? If you are doing sequential, non multi-plexed, reads why do poll or select? Sitting in read is more optimal and the read should return either data or an error. The flaw in recv is that it returns a non-error non-data status. Perhaps it would be better to switch to using read() instead of recv?

This is really getting off-topic, though.

Yes. Isn't it fun ?-)


--
Brian Ford

-- Peter A. Castro <doctor@fruitbat.org> or <Peter.Castro@oracle.com> "Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]