This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
At 07:00 PM 3/21/2006, you wrote:
jdeifik wrote:I have a dual xeon 2.4ghz machine with hypertreading enabled. This gives me 4 logical processors.
I am not sure why it is important to have a HT aware scheduler for Windows, when there are 4 or more
threads. I can see with 2 threads you would like to have one per physical processor.
With 4 or more threads, cygwin phtreads really sucks, 4->62%, 6->39%, 8->30% efficiency.
It seems to me that more and more apps are turning to threading for performance,
and more and more hardware is available with multi-processor, multi-core, and multi-threading.
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |