This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: htonl, htons, ntohl and ntohs types
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:00:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: htonl, htons, ntohl and ntohs types
- References: <20060421092508.GA15855@tuxedo.skovlyporten.dk>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Apr 21 11:25, Lars Munch wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have noticed that the types of the functions htonl, htons, ntohs and
> ntohl differs from standard (and linux):
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/htonl.html
>
> Cygwin uses:
>
> unsigned long int ntohl(unsigned long int);
> unsigned short int ntohs(unsigned short int);
> unsigned long int htonl(unsigned long int);
> unsigned short int htons(unsigned short int);
>
> The standard (and Linux) has:
>
> uint32_t htonl(uint32_t hostlong);
> uint16_t htons(uint16_t hostshort);
> uint32_t ntohl(uint32_t netlong);
> uint16_t ntohs(uint16_t netshort);
>
> Is there any reason for this difference?
Nobody had a problem so far?
Fixed in CVS.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/