This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Similar Bash 3.1.18 CR/LF Problem
- From: "Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\)" <gsw at agere dot com>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:22:11 -0400
- Subject: RE: Similar Bash 3.1.18 CR/LF Problem
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> You haven't been paying attention, it seems.
> We've already been over this ground. The performance impact
> for turning on bash's automatic CRLF handling is profound.
> That's why we're here.
I guess WJM around here. :-) But perhaps I've been paying more
attention than you think.
If a patch is incorporated into upstream BASH, it's not going
to cause performance problems. If it did, it would be rejected.
That's something for the upstream maintainers to decide.
I may be coming at this from a different angle, to be sure. I'm
not really interested in a Cygwin-specific solution--I don't
particularly want the ability to write scripts that can't run
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html