This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Can't preview postscript files under xdvi
- From: Igor Peshansky <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: Toby Allsopp <Toby dot Allsopp at navman dot com>
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:35:14 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Can't preview postscript files under xdvi
- References: <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Toby Allsopp wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2006 at 05:47 NZDT, Ferran Mazzanti wrote:
> > The fact is that I've installed the latest release of cygwin, in an
> > attempt to have a unixlike enviroment under my Windows box. I use
> > LaTeX extensively and so I thought this could be a good
> > solution. However, whenever I include postscript figures in my
> > documents, xdvi refuses to display the, It produces an empty red box
> > in the place where it is supposed to display the figure, but the
> > figure does not appear. I can get the thing done by running dvips
> > and converting the .dvi file into a .ps one, which I can view with
> > gv. However this does not happen in my linux boxes, where I can
> > directly preview .dvi files displaying the postscript figures.
> > Any clue about this? Any simple solution I could try?
> I have had a similar problem caused by the fact that xdvi uses the
> first gs it finds on the PATH and if you have the ghostscript and
> ghostscript-x11 packages installed this is the non-X11 one and thus it
> can't render to xdvi's window.
> I have the following line in my ~/.Xresources file to fix it:
> xdvi.interpreter: gs-x11
> You could also pass the -interpreter option to xdvi.
Thanks, this is useful information. Should xdvi be configured OOTB to
look for gs-x11? If so, can the xdvi maintainer (if we have one) make a
|\ _,,,---,,_ firstname.lastname@example.org | email@example.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html