This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: GPGME 1.0.3 Build Problem
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <marcus dot brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum dot de>
- To: "djh" <henman at it dot to-be dot co dot jp>
- Cc: <gnupg-devel at gnupg dot org>, <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:32:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: GPGME 1.0.3 Build Problem
- References: <20061130141425.2692@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> <87wt5cx6t6.wl%marcus.brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <87slg0wb6v.wl%marcus.brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
At Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:09:32 +0900,
"djh" <henman@it.to-be.co.jp> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks again for your response.
>
> > From: Marcus Brinkmann <marcus.brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
> > ...Shared library support various dramatically across platforms. Libtool
> > tries its best to patch it up and give a consistent picture, but it
> > can not always provide.
> >
> ....
> >
> > I gave it another look, and it seems to me that the problem could be
> > the following: GPGME tries to build versions of GPGME linking against
> > pthread and pth. These versions are built from a version of the
> > library without any thread support (libgpgme-real.la), which is not
> > installed. This non-installed library has undefined symbols, btw, but
> > it seems that libtool does not hickup over those (possibly because
> > it's not installed), or you didn't give us the warning message for
> > that case.
>
> I did receive the below "warning" message prior to the undefined symbol errors as follow: ( This does contain the "libgpgme-real.la" that you mentioned. Is this what you meant?
I saw that one in the original report. I meant rather a warning when
linking the actual libgpgme-real.la file, which must be some lines
before the one you posted.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/