This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [Ghdl-discuss] GHDL-0.27 for Cygwin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com 
> [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Dave Korn
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 9:56 AM
> To: 'Jason Pyeron'; 'GHDL discuss list'
> Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: [Ghdl-discuss] GHDL-0.27 for Cygwin
> 
> Jason Pyeron wrote on 05 August 2008 14:38:
> 
> >>>> Make fails with the following error:
> >>>> Comparing stages 2 and 3
> >>>> warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
> >>>> warning: ./libgcc/_chkstk.o differs Bootstrap comparison failure!
> >>>> ./ada/exp_aggr.o differs
> >>>> make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1
> >>>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc-4.2.4-build'
> >>>> make[1]: *** [stage3-bubble] Error 2
> >>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc-4.2.4-build'
> >>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
>   From this error message, your failure is happening at the 
> final stage of bootstrapping.  At this point, the new gcc has 
> been built, and is being used to rebuild itself as a 
> consistency check.  So this could be an error for one of two 
> reasons: your system gcc (3.4.4) could have compiled stage 1 
> badly in such a way that it compiled stage 2 badly in such a 
> way that it didn't rebuild itself correctly; or it could just 
> be a bug in the version of gcc that you're building.  The 
> latter is more likely than that a bug in the former could 
> propagate all the way through bootstrap, but either is still possible.
> 
> > I am able to compile c & ada support with release 4.2.0, but 4.2.1 
> > fails (identical error), this is looking like a regression.
> 
>   Yes, it does indeed.
> 
> > From the gcc-help
> > mailing list it looks like 4.2.x series is going to be very hard to 
> > get running on cygwin. Our only luck in this matter is that the 
> > problem looks to be a regression.
> 
>   If I were you, I'd file a report in the GCC bugzilla, and 
> then try using 4.3.0 instead, which I can confirm builds OOTB 
> on cygwin.
> 


The goal is to compile GHDL front end, which requires gcc=4.2.4, I assume that
means that it would not work for 4.3.x.


--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant              10 West 24th Street #100    -
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333            Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]