This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem
- From: ABCD <en dot ABCD at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:42:01 -0400
- Subject: Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem
- References: <499F6682.1090204@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20090224100616.GC6035@calimero.vinschen.de> <49A85971.6070300@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20090228104337.GG19887@calimero.vinschen.de> <49A986B4.2080501@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20090228201625.GA8503@calimero.vinschen.de> <49A9AA0C.9020904@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20090301102035.GB10046@calimero.vinschen.de> <gp4cb8$boh$1@ger.gmane.org> <49B66C43.3050203@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Feb 28 16:18, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>> I'm open to suggestions. "peimgflags"? Currently, aslr only
>>> peflags?
>> $0.02 from a mostly-lurker-these-days: chpe{h,hdr,header,f,flags}? That
>> way it's a verb instead of a noun...
>>
>
> ...except that the utility can also be used to display the flag values,
> as well. So 'ch*' (as in 'change*') isn't very accurate, either.
>
> --
> Chuck
>
>
USD0.02 from another lurker: split it into two programs, lspeflags and
chpeflags (or whatever)?
- --
ABCD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkm2mFkACgkQOypDUo0oQOr5BgCdF/ylr0/+sM3jF7d9XpLnz4I3
wrMAoIkZBple24MfvzpVNA3MCwOgjO8D
=3pGf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/