This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: units: update, FHS compliance
On 18/01/2010 13:38, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I think we could relax the ITP process if you wanted to do some bulk
moves but I would hate to have anyone have to support so many packages.
Even if I wasn't just concerned about your free time and sanity, I'd
be worried what would happen if you left the project.
Precisely why I've hesitated to take on lots more packages within the
distro.
However, if you really want to take on the task of doing a bulk move
we should talk about it in cygwin-apps.
I understand; we've done this before (Cygwin/X) and Corinna would like
me to do another (DocBook, ~25 packages)[1], but beyond that, my current
goal is only to remove the aformentioned overlaps[2] between the distro
and Ports.
Yaakov
[1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-01/msg00247.html
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin.ports.general/736
(Perhaps you could comment on the e2fsprogs issue raised there?)
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple