This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: autoreconf/gettext puzzle (was Re: sed match DOS end of line)
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:51:33 +0200
- Subject: Re: autoreconf/gettext puzzle (was Re: sed match DOS end of line)
- References: <01E9402441FFBB4BBEA0A82549A7D94A0C27C5 at ORD2MBX02C dot mex05 dot mlsrvr dot com> <20130627142405 dot GA2378 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20130627144952 dot GB2378 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51CC5D69 dot 40700 at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Jun 27 10:42, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2013-06-27 09:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Ok, here's me, even more puzzled. FIW, the 4.2.2 packages have *not*
> >been built the same way as the 4.2.1 package. The difference is running
> >autoreconf (4.2.2) vs. not running autoreconf (4.2.1).
>
> Were these natively compiled or cross-compiled? The latter pulls in
> gnulib functions in place of libc's (Cygwin) without intervention
> during configure.
>
> >If I build sed with the auto configury unchanged, I'm back to an sed
> >which handles the CR just as the old sed 4.2.1 package:
> >
> > $ sed --version | head -1
> > sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2
> > $ od -c eol
> > 0000000 e n d o f l i n e \r \n
> > 0000013
> > $ sed 's/e$/X/' < eol
> > endoflinX
> >
> >However, 4.2.2-1 and 4.2.2-2 packages have been built running autoreconf
> >first, which, besides other things, updates the included gettext stuff
> >from version 0.17 to version 0.18.1.
> >
> >So I'm wondering if the latest gettext is the culprit here, but I'm not
> >fluent enough in the differences within gettext to see where the problem
> >is.
>
> I doubt it; as long as libintl is dynamically linked, the gettext
> build infrastructure just handles .po.mo rules.
Yeah, I seem to be entirely on the wrong track, sorry about that.
I'm just inspecting the sources and it seems that the read mode of
files has changed from "rt" to "r" between 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 for some
reason.
I'm still digging, and I'm unsure how I could create a version of
sed 4.2.2 which did the right thing at all a couple of minutes ago.
Still digging...
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple