This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: CVS version 32 vs 64-bit


On Jul 11, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Vince Rice <vrice@solidrocksystems.com> wrote:

> On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 11/07/2016 18:40, Vince Rice wrote:
>> Is there a reason there’s a different version of cvs in 32-bit vs 64-bit Cygwin?
>> 
>> 32-bit shows 1.12.13-10.
>> 64-bit shows 1.11.23.
>> 
>> (Yes, I know, git forever, but not everyone got the memo.)
>> --
> 
> https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-07/msg00054.html
> 
> 1.11.23-2 is the last version for both arch
> 
> Regards
> Marco

Hmmm. Then I wonder how this is true.

From my 32-bit VM:
C:\>cygcheck -c cvs
Cygwin Package Information
Package              Version        Status
cvs                  1.12.13-10     OK

From my 64-bit VM:
C:\>cygcheck -c cvs
Cygwin Package Information
Package              Version        Status
cvs                  1.11.23-2      OK

Since it’s already installed on 32-bit, I had to run the 32-bit setup in my 64-bit VM to see what the choices were. (The 1.12.13-10 shows up as the “Keep” version on my 32-bit VM’s 32-bit setup.) The one I have doesn’t appear on the spinner, but the package I have installed is clearly valid, and I only get packages from Cygwin (no ports, etc.). Weird.

Thanks for info.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]