This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin strptime() is missing "%s" which strftime() has
- From: "Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]" <lavr at ncbi dot nlm dot nih dot gov>
- To: "cygwin at cygwin dot com" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:24:29 +0000
- Subject: Re: Cygwin strptime() is missing "%s" which strftime() has
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lavr at ncbi dot nlm dot nih dot gov;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> > > But that's just scanning a decimal integer to time_t.
> > It's not a question of whether I can or can't convert a string into an
> > integer, rather it's a question about portability of code that uses %s
> I see your point but... "portability" is kind of the wrong expression
> here. If you have portability in mind, you should *not* use %s at all.
The point is, if I can use "%s" with strftime() on Cygwin, then I should be able to use "%s" with strptime(),
but currently there's a disconcert with that. Indeed, "%s" is a GNU extension yet it has been on Linux for years,
so why not here but only 50%?
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple