This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: Lists/Re: DOCBOOK: DocBook XML and XMLspy
- From: Dave Pawson <daveP at dpawson dot freeserve dot co dot uk>
- To: Bernd Kreimeier <bk at oddworld dot com>, Jirka Kosek <jirka at kosek dot cz>
- Cc: "docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org" <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 18:07:50 +0000
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Lists/Re: DOCBOOK: DocBook XML and XMLspy
- References: <sh8zc47f1c.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de><5.1.0.14.0.20011115161713.02c44500@pop.mail.yahoo.com><p04330100b81ad0840ff8@[192.168.254.4]> <87adws8epg.fsf@nwalsh.com><20011210100710.A18914@kasba.alcove-fr> <87adwr6tw0.fsf@nwalsh.com><sh8zc47f1c.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de><5.1.0.14.2.20011216063102.00afcd10@127.0.0.1> <871yhty6pk.fsf@nwalsh.com><3C1EC3A0.6B43FC90@oddworld.com> <3C1F00D2.2F850A1@kosek.cz>
At 10:17 18/12/2001 -0800, Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
>Maybe it's just me, but I find this page
> http://www.docbook.org/mailinglist/index.html
>
>and the distinctions on it slightly confusing. It might benefit from
>listing concrete examples, e.g.:
>
> docbook-apps:
> 3rd party editors
> parsers and parser bugs?
> backends and backend bugs?
> installs and distributions (e.g. RedHat, Win2K)?
>
> docbook
> DTD internals and bugs?
> stylesheet internals and bugs?
> feature requests?
>
>A common convention is "user" vs. "developer" list. When it comes to
>questions relating to day-to-day use of DocBook, is this "applied" and
>thus docbooks-apps? Or "general DocBook questions"?
>
>Incidentally, this
> http://www.docbook.org/mailinglist/guidelines.html
>is missing?
Hi Bernd,
Docbook is 'strange' / different in that respect.
The division is markup verses styling.
I think your point is well made about better descriptions.
Regards DaveP