This is the mail archive of the docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: DocBook and TeX/LaTeX

From: Ian Castle <ian dot castle at coldcomfortfarm dot net>
To: Michael Wiedmann <mw at miwie dot in-berlin dot de>
Cc: DocBook-Apps ML <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:13:50 +0000
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: DocBook and TeX/LaTeX
References: <20020224111816.GA2296@miwie.in-berlin.de><1014551169.1100.5.camel@kerberos.sunnyroyd.coldcomfortfarm.org><20020224123528.GA3946@miwie.in-berlin.de>

On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 12:35, Michael Wiedmann wrote:
> * Ian Castle <ian.castle@coldcomfortfarm.net> [020224 11:46]:
>  
> > PassiveTeX takes this approach
> > 
> > see http://www.hcu.ox.ac.uk/TEI/Software/passivetex/
> 
> passivetex works on FO files, whereas using xmltex with a special
> DocBook map file would create native LaTeX code and let (pdf)latex
> typeset the document - a task which TeX solves really excellent.
> 

Thought I must be missing something obvious.

But what are the advantages?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- DocBook and TeX/LaTeX
  - From: Michael Wiedmann
- Re: DocBook and TeX/LaTeX
  - From: Ian Castle
- Re: DocBook and TeX/LaTeX
  - From: Michael Wiedmann

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]