This is the mail archive of the docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list .
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Bob Stayton wrote:
Yes, my carelessness. The FO namespace was an artifact from an earlier customization effort.On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:18:45PM -0500, ed nixon wrote:Bob,
<snip/>
After:
<div xmlns="" xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format" class="abstract">
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Some document projects successfully completed...</p>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Now, the challenge is to integrate...</p>
</div>
This is very strange. How would your HTML output include a reference to the fo namespace? Does your HTML customization include any references to that namespace?
Correct, now all that remains are the xhtml namespace attributes. Unfortunately, they invalidate the output with both the W3C validator and my desktop copy of CSE HTML Validator.
But other than the namespace
attributes, the output is correct, right?
There are no empty <p><b> for the missing
abstract title.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |