This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
[docbook-apps] Re: 'pgwide' attribute in 'figure' element as a child of 'glossdef'
- From: "Paul A. Hoadley" <paulh at logicsquad dot net>
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- Cc: Bob Stayton <bobs at sco dot com>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 22:28:34 +0930
- Subject: [docbook-apps] Re: 'pgwide' attribute in 'figure' element as a child of 'glossdef'
- References: <20030304135335.GA80070@grover.logicsquad.net> <20030304094444.E1952@sco.com> <873ckyr8je.fsf@nwalsh.com>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0100, Norman Walsh wrote:
> | Since the figure is part of the glossdef block, I don't
> | think you can get it to center on the page without
> | further intervention.
>
> Would setting the left and right margins to zero if pgwide=1 is
> specified do The Right Thing?
Wouldn't the image being in a fo:list-item-body element prevent this?
Or could the margins be over-ridden? (As an aside, I can't quite
decide whether centering the image in the page when it's part of the
glossary definition would look good or not. In the situation I was
describing, I just scaled the image down far enough, and it looked
quite good centred in the definition block.)
--
Paul.
mailto:paulh at logicsquad dot net
mailto:phoadley at maths dot adelaide dot edu dot au
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe at lists dot oasis-open dot org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help at lists dot oasis-open dot org