This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] How to specify out resolution for FO
- From: Sean Wheller <sean at enbaya dot co dot za>
- To: David Tolpin <dvd at davidashen dot net>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 11:34:12 +0200
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] How to specify out resolution for FO
- Organization: Enbaya
- References: <200402010910.i119AT07027806@adat.davidashen.net>
- Reply-to: sean at enbaya dot co dot za
On Sunday 01 February 2004 11:10, David Tolpin wrote:
> > In my experience, it is always easier to prepare production files in such
> > a way that they are optimized for the equipment of the print shop doing
> > your production. It saves lots of time, both sides, and increases the
> > chances of getting production to the state of being a "repeatable
> > process". This state is often found in organizations that apply
> > engineering processes to their production.
> >
> > When files are not optimized, any number of tweaks may be required during
> > production, theses steps may be forgotten during future print runs. The
> > result being inconsistent quality.
>
> Sean,
>
> I've looked through PDF specification and generated sample images in
> Acrobat Distiller just to confirm.
>
> The only difference is the way raster images are stored; namely if you have
> a high resolution image and target a low resolution device, the image is
> scaled down before embedding into PDF.
This explains the problem I am experiencing with high res images not retaining
their original quality.
>
> Nothing else.
>
> And this very functionality is easily achieved with stylesheet parameters,
> choosing different images for different resolutions. Moreover, this
> solution will give better and more predictable quality.
This technique is not giving me the predictable quality level I want. The
result is consistant to be sure, but the image quality is reduced.
>
> > So, as far as I can see, providing you have Acrobat Distiller, the route
> > to obtaining PDF with a higher resolution should be something like this:
> >
> > XML > XSL-FO > PS > [ACROBAT DISTILLER]> PDF
>
> There is no such thing as PDF with higher resolution. The only difference
> is raster images, which are scaled down before inserting for lower
> resolutions.
>
> > how do we get resolution into our PS files? I think we're back to square
> > one.
>
> RenderX XEP provides processing-instructions to embed printer specific
> commands into Postscript output. You can use DocBook customization layer to
> add as many as you like.
OK, now I'm getting somewhere. There are obviously extensions required, of
which I have no knowledge. I will try to find the solution in the documents
provided with the XEP demo I am currently evaluating.
--
Sean Wheller
To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org, or visit http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.