[docbook-apps] Re: Typograhpical treatment of glossterms

[Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>]

/ Joachim Ziegler <ziegler@mpi-sb.mpg.de> was heard to say:
| Bob Stayton wrote:
|> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Joachim Ziegler wrote:
|>
|>> I'm just wondering why a (inline) glossterm without a linkend gets
|>> special typographical treatment in HTML and FO output whereas one
|>> with a linkend gets not. (?)
|> I see this problem on the FO side, but the HTML side is all
|> italic as far as I can see.  Can you give an example
|> of a file where the HTML inlines are different?
|
| No, sorry, I was not really exact. As you say, only the FO-output
| misses typographical treatment (when a glossterm has a linkend, not
| when it has none).

Bug. Fixed now.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | So, are you working on finding
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | that bug now, or are you leaving
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | it until later? Yes.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature