This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook on OSX : XSLT & XSL FO programs
- From: Gianluca Sforna <giallu at gmail dot com>
- To: Bob Stayton <bobs at sagehill dot net>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:02:09 +0100
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook on OSX : XSLT & XSL FO programs
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=OzCMj6p0psW8+FIvCeI8/hPCgTI3UimA7v1nh/LEKUNhFjbCLa0+ZMRQTOj+axnBsGOoSp6gYWuOt2NUnvIOEkiBNykmWDYza+suI7xYGwHiQpbai5Ll/CLWLFucrAUMdd1JR429gwJM2HWmCRLpIfrVB0TWFs8XWYyGpgzc5J8=
- References: <5BA7D652-2D0B-11D9-B26B-000D933B5D9E@cshl.edu> <019a01c4c123$aa8c6400$6401a8c0@toshiro> <47AA11A2-2D26-11D9-B26B-000D933B5D9E@cshl.edu> <004701c4c174$3eec7ef0$6501a8c0@toshiro>
- Reply-to: Gianluca Sforna <giallu at gmail dot com>
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:10:40 -0800, Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> wrote:
> Currently the three most complete and popular XSLT processors are Saxon,
> xsltproc, and Xalan. Regarding FO processors, PassiveTeX is very difficult
> to get working with DocBook XSL, and even then it does not support important
> parts of the XSL-FO standard. FOP is possibly the best free XSL-FO
> processor, but it also does not support all of the XSL-FO standard. It is
> usable, but difficult to get production-quality output.
Talking about this, I am still working with the SGML version of
DocBook, producing html and PDF versions of our users manual. Would
you suggest switching to XML now or waiting for a more complete
toolset???
thanks in advance
Gianluca