This is the mail archive of the
docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the docbook-tools project.
Re: More on jadetex/RedHat 6.0 problems.
- To: Andrew Dodd <atd7@cornell.edu>
- Subject: Re: More on jadetex/RedHat 6.0 problems.
- From: "David C. Mason" <dcm@redhat.com>
- Date: 16 Jun 1999 14:54:52 -0400
- cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906161428220.925-100000@afterburner>
Andrew Dodd <atd7@cornell.edu> writes:
> Specifically, I added these lines:
>
> hash_extra.jadetex = 15000
> hash_extra.pdfjadetex = 15000
> pool_size.jadetex = 500000
> pool_size.pdfjadetex = 500000
> string_vacancies.jadetex = 45000
> string_vacancies.pdfjadetex = 45000
> max_strings.jadetex = 55000
> max_strings.pdfjadetex = 55000
> pool_free.jadetex = 47500
> pool_free.pdfjadetex = 47500
> nest_size.jadetex = 500
> nest_size.pdfjadetex = 500
> param_size.jadetex = 1500
> param_size.pdfjadetex = 1500
> save_size.jadetex = 5000
> save_size.pdfjadetex = 5000
> stack_size.jadetex = 1500
> stack_size.pdfjadetex = 1500
We are actually working with the new tetex packages right now. The
problem you note will finally be added to the conf file! The problem
right now is some nasty font problem so whatever you do, dont get the
new tetex off the web!
When we have a better version I will let everyone know.
--
David Mason
Red Hat AD Labs
dcm@redhat.com