This is the mail archive of the
docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the docbook-tools project.
Re: Jadetex and pdftex problems, sgml file included
- To: docbook-tools-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Jadetex and pdftex problems, sgml file included
- From: Thomas Porter <txporter at mindspring dot com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:56:41 -0400
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008101321530.9281-100000@traveller.rlf.org> <3992EA24.A888C4D4@cybercable.tm.fr> <3992F924.FDA54CF4@mindspring.com> <3993089C.EC55265D@cybercable.tm.fr>
Eric Bischoff wrote:
>
> I've found a workaround to Thomas problem with PDF output, but I'm not
> sure I understand it ;-)
>
> In /usr/share/sgml/docbook/utils-0.5/backends/pdf, please remove the
> test on line 24, so pdfjadetex is unconditionally re-run
>
> The bug appears only with very simple (unrealistic) docbook files, where
> pdfjadetex is not re-run because of undefined references. This explains
> why I never run into it ;-).
>
> I don't know why pdfjadetex needs to be re-run if the first run seems
> perfectly enough. Any explanation in private mail welcome (at the end of
> this message the log of the first run is reproduced).
Eric,
Thanks for the work on this, but I determined that my problem was that
pdfjadetex in the rpm was generated with pdftex version 13, not version
14 like I am using.
I ended up downloading the jadetex src.rpm in order to get the
jadetex.ini and pdfjadetex.ini files out of it, then rebuilt the format
files using pdfinitex.
Just a suggestion to the jadetex rpm maintainer: they might want to
include the .ini files in the binary rpm to allow people to more easily
rebuild their .fmt files if needed.
--
Tom Porter txporter@mindspring.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament],
'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will
the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the
kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."